Understanding scientists' computational modeling decisions about climate risk management strategies using values-informed mental models

Global Environmental Change 42:107-116 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When developing computational models to analyze the tradeoffs between climate risk management strategies (i.e., mitigation, adaptation, or geoengineering), scientists make explicit and implicit decisions that are influenced by their beliefs, values and preferences. Model descriptions typically include only the explicit decisions and are silent on value judgments that may explain these decisions. Eliciting scientists’ mental models, a systematic approach to determining how they think about climate risk management, can help to gain a clearer understanding of their modeling decisions. In order to identify and represent the role of values, beliefs and preferences on decisions, we used an augmented mental models research approach, namely values-informed mental models (ViMM). We conducted and qualitatively analyzed interviews with eleven climate risk management scientists. Our results suggest that these scientists use a similar decision framework to each other to think about modeling climate risk management tradeoffs, including eight specific decisions ranging from defining the model objectives to evaluating the model’s results. The influence of values on these decisions varied between our scientists and between the specific decisions. For instance, scientists invoked ethical values (e.g., concerns about human welfare) when defining objectives, but epistemic values (e.g., concerns about model consistency) were more influential when evaluating model results. ViMM can (i) enable insights that can inform the design of new computational models and (ii) make value judgments explicit and more inclusive of relevant values. This transparency can help model users to better discern the relevance of model results to their own decision framing and concerns.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding pluralism in climate modeling.Wendy Parker - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):349-368.
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling.Kristen Intemann - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2):217-232.
Ethics and the role of the manager.John R. Boatright - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4):303 - 312.
Climate change: Do we know enough for policy action? [REVIEW]Stephen H. Schneider - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):607-636.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-21

Downloads
3 (#1,313,661)

6 months
1 (#447,139)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bryan Cwik
Portland State University
Nancy Tuana
Pennsylvania State University
Chad Gonnerman
University of Southern Indiana

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references