Authors
Seth Mayer
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
The American criminal justice system falls far short of democratic ideals. In response, democratic communitarian localism proposes a more decentralized system with a greater emphasis on local control. This approach aims to deconcentrate power and remove bureaucracy, arguing local control would reflect informal cultural life better than our current system. This view fails to adequately address localized domination, however, including in the background culture of society. As a result, it underplays the need for transformative, democratizing change. Rejecting communitarian localism, I defend a mass deliberative democratic approach to criminal justice reform that relies on institutions outside localities to democratize local institutions and background cultural patterns. Nonetheless, local institutions must be empowered to exert democratic control, as well as to influence institutions outside the locality. This process of democratic co-development offers greater hope for political equality, non-domination, and inclusive democratic deliberation about criminal law than democratic communitarian localism.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/pcw20212714
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Revenge, Victim’s Rights, and Criminal Justice.Michael Davis - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Participatory Democracy and Criminal Justice.Albert W. Dzur - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):115-129.
The Concept of Criminal Law.Sandra G. Mayson - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (3):447-464.
Comments on Foqué, “Criminal Justice in a Democracy”.Matt Matravers - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):229-233.
The Philosophy of Criminal Law and the Phenomenon of Anti-Democratization.Michał Peno - 2019 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 105 (4):471-483.
Victim-Offender and Community Empowerment: A New Paradigm in Criminal Justice.Charles K. B. Barton - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):25-46.
Finding Space for Criminal Prosecutions Post‐Conflict.Jovana Davidovic - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):53-68.
Deliberative Democracy, Different Voices and a Just Society.Debika Saha - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:335-338.
International Criminal Trials and the Circumstances of Justice.Colleen Murphy - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (4):575-585.
Now is the Time to Reform Our Criminal Justice System.Jim Webb - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2):163-167.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-16

Total views
2 ( #1,416,718 of 2,455,409 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,137 of 2,455,409 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes