Moral Status and the Direction of Duties

Ethics 123 (1):113-128 (2012)
Abstract
Gopal Sreenivasan’s “hybrid theory” states that a moral duty is directed toward an individual because her interests justify the assignment of control over the duty. An alternative “plain theory” states that the individual’s interests justify the duty itself. I argue that a strong moral status constraint explains Sreenivasan’s instrumentalization objection to a Razian plain theory but that his own model violates this constraint. I suggest how both approaches can be reformulated to satisfy the constraint, and I argue that a reformulated plain theory can also avoid an insufficiency objection. The hybrid approach consequently has no clear advantage over the plain approach.
Keywords directed duties  moral status  claim-rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/667835
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,446
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Directed Duties.Simon Căbulea May - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):523-532.
Why is It Disrespectful to Violate Rights?Rowan Cruft - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (2pt2):201-224.
Human Rights Law Without Natural Moral Rights.Rowan Cruft - 2015 - Ethics and International Affairs 29 (2):223-232.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Euthanasia and Physicians' Moral Duties.Gary Seay - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):517 – 533.
The Status of Moral Status.Benjamin Sachs - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.
Diamonds in the Cosmic Sands.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):22-31.
The Moral and Political Status of Children.David Archard - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.
Family, Choice and Distributive Justice.Veronique Munoz-Dardé - 2002 - In David Archard & Colin Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press.
Moral Status and the Treatment of Dissociative Identity Disorder.Timothy J. Bayne - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):87-105.
The Moral and Political Status of Children.David Archard & Colin M. [eds] Macleod - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.
The Ontological and Moral Status of Organizations.Christopher McMahon - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):541-554.
Duties to Companion Animals.Steve Cooke - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (3):261-274.
Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge.Pablo Gilabert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.
Added to PP index
2012-11-29

Total downloads
61 ( #96,450 of 2,226,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #184,099 of 2,226,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature