British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):191-201 (2016)
AbstractFor philosophical readers, a review of biology Nobel laureate Eric R. Kandel’s Age of Insight historical thesis, that today’s ‘neuroaesthetics’ is a continuation of Vienna’s great contributions to modernism from 1900 on, becomes a ‘critical study’, by closely examining Kandel’s valuable account of E.H. Gombrich’s psychology, then, broadly, his own case for the validity of ‘neuroaesthetics’. The article much credits Kandel for recognising and explaining—unlike most philosophers, with their epistemological and metaphysical perspectives—why Gombrich’s Art and Illusion is subtitled ‘Psychology’, since it is about what its author termed throughout ‘convincing’ depiction. But, while holding that Kandel’s case for ‘neuroaesthetics’ is, at least in tone, superior to Ramachandran’s, the study broadens still further into a critical examination of it, with at first standard—since Aristotle—arguments against reductivism, as a materialism that neglects first formal then final causes or purposes. Original to the critique is an additional argument, that so-called ‘neuroaesthetics’ is not only inconsistent with the ‘reductionist’—not reductivist—principles of Kandel’s own science, as explained in his earlier account of them, In Search of Memory, but also contradicts a basic Darwinian principle underlying all modern biology, that genuine novelty can arise from rearrangement of older materials. The conclusion is that although neuroscience may make important contributions to aesthetics and appreciation, there is as yet no basis for holding that it could produce an aesthetics.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception, by Bence Nanay. [REVIEW]Ophelia Deroy - 2017 - Mind 126 (502):635-643.
Similar books and articles
Feeling, Meaning, and Intentionality—a Critique of the Neuroaesthetics of Beauty.Peer F. Bundgaard - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):781-801.
Polanyi’s Epistemology in the Light of Neuroscience.Walter Gulick - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):73-82.
Illusion and Art: An Analysis and Critique of E. H. Gombrich's "Art and Illusion".James William Mock - 1988 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Art, the Brain, and Family Resemblances: Some Considerations on Neuroaesthetics.Marcello Frixione - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):699 - 715.
“Aesthetic Primitives”: Fundamental Biological Elements of a Naturalistic Aesthetics.Ellen Dissanayake - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (1):6-24.
Art as a Metaphor of the Mind: A Neo-Jamesian Aesthetics Embracing Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and Evolution.Andrea Lavazza - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (2):159-182.
Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can We Learn From Wittgenstein?Elisa Caldarola - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):239-253.
Neuroaesthetics and Beyond: New Horizons in Applying the Science of the Brain to the Art of Dance. [REVIEW]Emily S. Cross & Luca F. Ticini - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):5-16.
Pictorial Perception as Illusion.Katerina Bantinaki - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):268-279.
The Essential Gombrich Selected Writings on Art and Culture.E. H. Gombrich & Richard Woodfield - 1996