On Oppy’s Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument

Philo 8 (2):123-130 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a reply to Graham Oppy’s “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” published in Philo 7, 2. I argue that he fails to refute myModal Perfection Argument for the existence of a Supreme Being, and that it remains arguably sound in the face of his alleged counterexamples and parodies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
Maydole on Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445.
Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Bydgoszcz: Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.
Oppy on the Argument From Consciousness.J. P. Moreland - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):70-83.
Paley’s Inductive Inference to Design.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):491-502.
Oppy on the Argument From Consciousness: A Rejoinder.J. P. Moreland - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):213 - 226.
Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
190 (#65,350)

6 months
2 (#276,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Existence as a Perfection.Michael Wreen - 2017 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 20 (1):161-172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references