Part and Whole in Aristotle‘s Political Philosophy

The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):325-340 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is often held that according to Aristotle the city is a natural organism. One major reason for this organic interpretation is no doubt that Aristotle describes the relationship between the individual and the city as a part-whole relationship, seemingly the same relationship that holds between the parts of a natural organism and the organism itself. Moreover, some scholars (most notably Jonathan Barnes) believe this view of the city led Aristotle to accept an implicit totalitarianism. I argue, however, that an investigation of the various ways Aristotle describes parts and wholes reveals that for Aristotle the city has a unity (and thus a nature) quite different from that of a natural organism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

68 (#231,141)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Mayhew
Seton Hall University

References found in this work

Exchange.[author unknown] - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (1):49-90.

Add more references