Philosophy of Science 61 (4):529-533 (1994)

Abstract
A theory may be invalid, not owing to erroneous observations or the invocation of an inappropriate law, but because of the use of equivocal terms. This is demonstrated for Darwin's failed model of sympatric speciation through the principle of divergence
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289820
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue Ethics and Repugnant Conclusions.Matt Zwolinski & David Schmidtz - 2005 - In R. Sandler & P. Cafaro (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 107--17.
Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure, and Welfare.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
Subjective Reasons.Eric Vogelstein - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):239-257.
Doubts About Moral Principles.Peter Mew - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):289 – 308.
Reasons and Psychological Causes.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (1):51 - 101.
A Major Failure Within Modern Analytic Philosophy.Patrick Sibelius - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (4):558-567.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
219 ( #39,138 of 2,368,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #556,092 of 2,368,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes