Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (3):357–363 (2005)
AbstractI will argue in what follows, following the insights of James Marshall on busno‐cratic power, that resistance to this new power is already well underway, and that this resistance is potentially problematic and potentially transgressive 1 . The self is not only a chooser in busno‐cratic land, it is also re‐commodifying itself and in so doing, beginning to struggle at the limits of its commodified situation. I will argue that commodified selves, as much as they are constrained, are also potent sites for resistance. Part of that resistance is being waged in the terrain of the high stakes test, where the self that could ‘choose’ runs headlong into a product that definitively limits its range of choice. In order to engage critically with this resistance, I examine the cracks in the monolithic power of testing, cracks that point to the uncertainty of numbers and the ambivalent anxieties of test takers
Similar books and articles
Some Problems with Chow's Problems with Power.Deborah G. Mayo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):212-213.
Worldwide Testing and Test Security Issues: Ethical Challenges and Solutions.David F. Foster - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):207-228.
Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Â€œGenetic Testing of the General Population: Ethical and Informatic Concernsâ€.Kelly Smith - unknown
Introducing Vouchers and Standardized Tests for Higher Education in Russia: Expectations and Measurements.Ararat Osipian - unknown
The Window of Opportunity: Decision Theory and the Timing of Prognostic Tests for Newborn Infants.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (9):503-514.
The Testing Culture and the Persistence of High Stakes Testing Reforms.Michele S. Moses & Michael J. Nanna - 2007 - Education and Culture 23 (1):55-72.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads