Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):159-167 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
The key role of representativeness in evidence-based education.Kathryn E. Joyce - 2019 - Educational Research and Evaluation 25 (1-2):43-62.
In defense of meta-analysis.Bennett Holman - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3189-3211.
Down with the Hierarchies.Jacob Stegenga - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):313-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-16

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Interpreting causality in the health sciences.Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):157 – 170.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
Measuring effectiveness.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:62-71.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.

View all 18 references / Add more references