The Scientific Study of Consciousness Cannot and Should Not Be Morally Neutral

Perspectives on Psychological Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A target question for the scientific study of consciousness is how dimensions of consciousness, such as the ability to feel pain and pleasure or reflect on one’s own experience, vary in different states and animal species. Considering the tight link between consciousness and moral status, answers to these questions have implications for law and ethics. Here we point out that given this link, the scientific community studying consciousness may face implicit pressure to carry out certain research programs or interpret results in ways that justify current norms rather than challenge them. We show that because consciousness largely determines moral status, the use of nonhuman animals in the scientific study of consciousness introduces a direct conflict between scientific relevance and ethics—the more scientifically valuable an animal model is for studying consciousness, the more difficult it becomes to ethically justify compromises to its well-being for consciousness research. Finally, in light of these considerations, we call for a discussion of the immediate ethical corollaries of the body of knowledge that has accumulated and for a more explicit consideration of the role of ideology and ethics in the scientific study of consciousness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,952

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foundations of consciousness.Antti Revonsuo - 2017 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Leaving the Soul Apart. An Introductory Study.Pietro Gori - 2015 - Philosophical Readings 7 (2):3-13.
God, God* and God'.Graham Oppy - 2004 - In Anthony Fisher & Hayden Ramsay (eds.), Faith and Reason: Friends or Foes in a New Millennium? Hindmarsh, South Australia: ATF Press. pp. 171-186.
Science qua science is not morally neutral.John E. McPeck - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:858-864.
The Scientific Study of Consciousness: Searle’s Radical Request.Mahesh Ananth - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (2):59-89.
Synesthesia and consciousness.Noam Sagiv & Chris D. Frith - 2013 - In Julia Simner & Edward Hubbard (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford University Press. pp. 924--940.
What is consciousness and has it evolved?Albert Low - 2005 - World Futures 61 (3):199 – 227.
How to study consciousness scientifically.John R. Searle - 1998 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353 (1377).
Is consciousness intrinsically valuable?Andrew Y. Lee - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (1):1–17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-16

Downloads
10 (#898,276)

6 months
10 (#100,530)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Simon Brown
Johns Hopkins University
Jolien Francken
University of Amsterdam
2 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references