How did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation?

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300-319 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peirce believed that inquiry involves three types of reasoning—abduction, deduction, and induction. While Peirce’s beliefs about reasoning, especially abduction, changed over time, in his mature work the following picture of reasoning emerges: abduction generates and chooses hypotheses to test; deduction determines the entailments of a hypothesis; induction ascertains whether the evidence accords with the hypothesis in question.1 Peirce both identified abduction and coined the word.2 His concept of abduction is one of the most original contributions he made to the study of reasoning. It is also one of the most poorly understood. Peirce’s concept of abduction has been distorted by contemporary...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,019

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abduction as a Aspect of Retroduction.Phyllis Chiasson - 2001 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Defending abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):451.
Eco and Peirce on Abduction.Francesco Bellucci - 2018 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 10 (1).
Problems with Peirce's concept of abduction.Michael Hoffmann - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
Abduction or the Logic of Surprise.Jaime Nubiola - 2005 - Semiotica 2005 (153 - 1/4):117-130.
Truth-Seeking by Abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2004 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 11:57-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
162 (#142,265)

6 months
18 (#155,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?