Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):139-157 (2004)

Noelle Claire McAfee
Emory University
This paper argues that the public can do more than legitimate government; it can provide public knowledge for sound public policy. Critics of democracy worry that the public has too little objectivity and impartiality to know what is best. These critics have a point: taken one by one, people have little knowledge of the whole. For this reason, citizens need to escape the cloisters of kith and kin and enter a world of unlike others. They need to be open to other perspectives and concerns. They need to deliberate with others in public. In other words, an inchoate plurality of people needs to become public in order to develop a more comprehensive picture of the whole and to define ‘where the shoe pinches’. Democracy requires that the multitude deliberate publicly in order to create public knowledge by which sound public policy can be formed. Key Words: deliberation • democracy • John Dewey • Jürgen Habermas • legitimacy • particularity • perspectives • rational deliberative • proceduralism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453704041241
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Delibration and Democratic Legitimacy.Joshua Cohen - 1989 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
The Public and its problems.John Dewey - 1927 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 13 (3):367-368.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defense of Democracy as a Way of Life: A Reply to Talisse's Pluralist Objection.Shane J. Ralston - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):629-659.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy?Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
Public Health and Public Goods.Jonny Anomaly - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas's Theory of Democracy.Matthew Weinshall - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):23-58.
Deliberating About the Public Interest.Ian O’Flynn - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):299-315.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #671,258 of 2,533,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #260,225 of 2,533,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes