Caveat Auditor: Epistemic Trust and Conflicts of Interest

Social Epistemology 38 (3):290-301 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To place epistemic trust in someone is to take their word for something. Much of the existing literature on epistemic trust concerns epistemic authorities. But as important as authority is to epistemic trust, it pales in comparison to the epistemic importance of conflicts of interests. In economics, we say that buyers shouldn’t take the word of sellers. Caveat emptor: let the buyer beware. I argue for a similar principle in epistemology. Caveat auditor: let the hearer beware. Others often have incentives to testify in ways that are odds with our epistemic goals. Given this, our epistemic trust in others should be calibrated to reflect the epistemically virtuous and perverse incentives of ourselves and others. This basic principle explains the need for epistemic caution in a wide range of applied topics from politics to product reviews to fake news.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,666

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-21

Downloads
72 (#271,151)

6 months
21 (#131,124)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin McBrayer
Fort Lewis College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Transparency is Surveillance.C. Thi Nguyen - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 105 (2):331-361.

View all 12 references / Add more references