Mathematical physicist Lee Smolin has proposed a theory of Cosmological natural selection which, he argues, explains the existence of our life-supporting universe, and which, he claims, is superior to Anthropic Principle explanations. I will argue in this paper that the theory of Cosmological natural selection does not provide an improvement upon the Weak Anthropic Principle.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Copernicus, Kant, and the Anthropic Cosmological Principles.S. Roush - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):5-35.
Are Cosmological Theories Compatible with All Possible Evidence: A Missing Methodological Link.Nick Bostrom - unknown
Bookkeeping or Metaphysics? The Units of Selection Debate.D. M. Walsh - 2004 - Synthese 138 (3):337 - 361.
Pruning the Tree of Life.Karen Neander - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):59-80.
Cosmological Artificial Selection: Creation Out of Something? [REVIEW]Rüdiger Vaas - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):25-28.
The Non-Existence of a Principle of Natural Selection.Abner Shimony - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (3):255-273.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #143,602 of 2,153,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?