Autonomy, Property and Distributive Justice

Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2001)
Abstract
The concept of autonomy is often utilized in order to resolve contentious moral, legal, and political issues. Yet, while a principle of "respect for autonomy" has come to occupy a central place in Western moral and political philosophy, it is not clear what such a principle could mean. In this dissertation, I examine the concept of autonomy and the principle of respect for autonomy as it applies to distributive justice. I take up three interrelated issues: first, which concept of autonomy is appropriate for questions of applied ethics and political philosophy? There are several conceptions of autonomy, not all of which can be used successfully in the debate over distributive justice. Second, given the appropriate conception of autonomy, what is its connection with what is to be distributed, namely goods and property. I argue that there is a vital connection between autonomy and property, such that persons cannot lead autonomous lives without property. Third, the relationship between property and autonomy bear upon the moral and political principles that the state adopts, and I conclude that need-based principles of distribution properly respects autonomy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,094
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Much Should We Value Autonomy?Marina Oshana - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):99-126.
Disadvantage, Autonomy, and the Continuity Test.Ben Colburn - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3):254-270.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Kantian Autonomy and Political Liberalism.Christian F. Rostbøll - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):341-364.
Justice, Fairness, and World Ownership.C. Fabre - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (3):249-273.
How to Distinguish Autonomy From Integrity.Carolyn McLeod - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):107 - 133.
Autonomy Modest.Rüdiger Bittner - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S7):1-11.
A Defence of Democratic Egalitarianism.Sagar Sanyal - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (7):413-34.
Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Paul Guyer - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):70-98.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature