Health Care Analysis 7 (1):57-77 (1999)
Most writers now recognize that mental health policy and the mental health system are extremely resistant to real changes that reflect genuine biopsychosocial paradigms of mental disorder. Writers bemoaning the intransigence of the mental health system tend to focus on a small analytical level, only to find themselves mired in the rationalities of the existing system. Problems are acknowledged to be system-wide, yet few writers have used a method of analysis appropriate for systemic problems. Drawing upon the General System Theory (GST) analytical perspective, this article advances a systematic approach to understand the mental health system and to facilitate the development of reform strategies that recognize the system's complexity and changing nature. The article first discusses the failure of major reform efforts in the mental health system and the limitations of mainstream analysis of mental health politics and policies with respect to the objectives of analysis and reform. This article describes how systems thinking has thus far influenced the study of the mental health policy and politics system, and argues that a systemic perspective is profitable for reconceiving the mental health system, enabling a fresh basis for the development of reform strategies. The mental health system should be seen as a social system influenced by larger political and economic dimensions, not just as a 'delivery system' scientifically constructed by neutral experts. Furthermore, the policy planning process should be viewed as part and parcel of a mental health system modeled as complex and dynamic. The systemic perspective outlined here should help both to clarify the value-based objectives that we hold for the system and, consequently, to plan for the strategic reforms that have so far eluded us
|Keywords||epistemology ethics General System Theory mental health policy politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ethics and Value Strategies Used in Prioritizing Mental Health Services in Oregon.David A. Pollack, Bentson H. McFarland, Robert A. George & Richard H. Angell - 1993 - HEC Forum 5 (5):322-339.
Health Care Reform and Societal Values.Hong Fung, Nancy Tse & E. K. Yeoh - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):638 – 652.
Mental Ill Health, Public Health and Medicalization.A. Vilhelmsson, T. Svensson & A. Meeuwisse - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):207-217.
Why the United States Should Adopt a Single-Payer System of Health Care Finance.David DeGrazia - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):145-160.
Personal Freedom and Responsibility: The Ethical Foundations of a Market-Based Health Care Reform.Robert Emmet Moffit - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):471-481.
Problems and the Potential Direction of Reforms for the Current Individual Medical Savings Accounts in the Chinese Health Care System.X. Kong, Y. Yang, F. Gong & M. Zhao - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):556-567.
Should We Create a Health Care System in the United States?Laurence B. McCullough - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):483-490.
Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Healthcare System.Angelo E. Volandes & Michael K. Paasche-Orlow - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):5 – 10.
Some Aspects of the Reform of the Health Care Systems in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.Engelbert Theurl - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (4):331-354.
Mental Health Services Within the New York State Department of Correctional Services: An Examination of Best Policies and Practices.William J. Morgan Jr - unknown
Is Writing Good for Your Mental Health or Is There More to Life?Mary Nettle - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (3):269-270.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads22 ( #226,166 of 2,164,236 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,164,236 )
How can I increase my downloads?