Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (1):297 - 317 (2008)

Authors
Colleen McCluskey
Saint Louis University
Abstract
There has been a great deal of interest in medieval action theory in recent years. Nonetheless, relatively little work has been done on figures prior to the so-called High Middle Ages, and much of what has been done has focused on better-known thinkers, such as Augustine and Anselm. By comparison, Bernard of Clairvaux's treatise, De gratia et libero arbitrio has been neglected. Yet his treatise is quoted widely by such important scholars as Philip the Chancellor, Alexander of Hales, and Albertus Magnus. Some historians of philosophy argue that his writings inspired the voluntarist movement that developed in the 1270s. Thus, Bernard must be seen as an important influence upon later medieval theories of action. In this paper, I examine the basic structure of his interesting account of human action and its freedom and conclude by raising some further issues connected to his work. /// Nos últimos anos assistiu-se a uma retoma do interesse pela teoria medieval da acção. Apesar disso, poucos estudos têm versado sobre os pensadores anteriores à assim chamada Alta Idade Média, para além de que esses estudos se debruçam sobretudo sobre os filósofos mais conhecidos, como é o caso de Agostinho e de Anselmo. Comparativamente, o tratado de S. Bernardo de Claraval, De gratia et libero arbítrio, não tem suscitado muita atenção crítica. Contudo, numerosos pensadores citaram este tratado, entre eles Filipe o Chanceler, Alexandre de Hales, e Alberto Magno. Vários histonadores da filosofia têm avançado a tese de que os escritos de Bernardo influenciaram o movimento voluntarista que se desenvolveu nos anos 1270. Nesse sentido, as ideias de Bernardo de Claraval tiveram um certo impacto sobre as teorias da acção que haveriam de aparecer mais tarde. No presente artigo, a autora examina as ideias do pensador medieval sobre a acção humana e a sua liberdade, terminando com o levantar de algumas novas questões sobre o tratado de Bernardo de Claraval.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,913
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bernardus Philosophus.Wim Verbaal - 2004 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 60 (3):567 - 586.
Lonergan and Art.Glenn Hughes - 2007 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):991 - 1000.
Disentangling Potestas in the Works of St. Bernard of Clairvaux.Alice Chapman - 2004 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 60 (3):587 - 600.
Sapientia Dei und Scientia mundi nach Bernhard von Clairvaux.Markus Enders - 2004 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 60 (3):555 - 565.
Logical Foundations: Lonergan and Analytical Philosophy.Andrew Beards - 2007 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):919 - 939.
The Rationale for a Catholic Philosophy: According to Maurice Blondel.Oliva Blanchette - 2004 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 60 (2):329 - 348.
Recent Conceptions of the Philosophy of Nature.Willibrord Welten - 1992 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 48 (1):59 - 75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
24 ( #432,802 of 2,409,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,301 of 2,409,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes