Contraception as Contralife

In Ethical Sex. South Bend: Fidelity Press. pp. 34-65 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An in-depth critique of arguments of John Finnis, Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle and William May to the effect that contraception is necessarily contralife in the sense of exhibiting a will against a possible person.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Improving the analogies in contralife arguments: The consistency of catholic teachings about regulating births.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (3):442-452.
The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):235-240.
Colloquy.Lawrence Masek - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2):199-202.
The Contralife Argument Revisted.Lawrence Masek - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (3):509-519.
Reconsidering the Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Steven Dezort - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1):71-81.
Is Contraception Contralife?: A Critique of Grisez et al.Kevin Rickert - 1992 - Lyceum 4 (1):19-38.
Contraception and the Contralife Will.R. A. Connor - 1991 - Gregorianum 72 (4):705-723.
Natural law and moral inquiry: ethics, metaphysics, and politics in the work of Germain Grisez.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1998 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Treating Humanity as an Inviolable End: An Analysis of Contraception and Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):1-16.
Contraception and the Natural Law.Germain G. Grisez - 1964
Can a couple practicing NFP be practicing contraception?W. H. Marshner - 1996 - Gregorianum 77 (4):677-704.
Contraception and the Natural Law. [REVIEW]M. B. Crowe - 1968 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 17:288-291.
A New Formulation of a Natural-Law Argument Against Contraception.Germain Grisez - 1966 - The Thomist 30 (4):343.
Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender: A Critique of New Natural Law.Nicholas Bamforth & David A. J. Richards - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by David A. J. Richards.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-28

Downloads
125 (#141,404)

6 months
53 (#78,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony McCarthy
International Theological Institute

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references