Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: The example of concealed medications

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):65 – 76 (2007)

Authors
Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine
Abstract
The clinical ethics literature is striking for the absence of an important genre of scholarship that is common to the literature of clinical medicine: systematic reviews. As a consequence, the field of clinical ethics lacks the internal, corrective effect of review articles that are designed to reduce potential bias. This article inaugurates a new section of the annual "Clinical Ethics" issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy on systematic reviews. Using recently articulated standards for argument-based normative ethics, we provide a systematic review of the literature on concealed medication for the management of psychiatric disorders. Four steps are completed: identify a focused question; conduct a literature search using key terms relevant to the focused question; assess the adequacy of the argument-based methods of the papers identified; and identify conclusions drawn in each paper and whether they apply to the focused question. We identified seven papers and provide an assessment of them. While none of the papers fully meet the standards of argument-based ethics, they did provide rationales for the use of concealed medications, with the important requirement such a practice be accountable in explicit organizational policy to prevent abuse of patients with mental illness or dementia.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310601152206
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,483
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Write a Systematic Review of Reasons.D. Strech & N. Sofaer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121-126.
Systematic Reviews in Bioethics: Types, Challenges, and Value.R. Mcdougall - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):89-97.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsibly Managing Uncertainties In Clinical Ethics.L. B. McCullough - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):1-5.
What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Phronesis in Clinical Ethics.Glenn Mcgee - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
The Critical Turn in Clinical Ethics and its Continous Enhancement.Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
33 ( #278,771 of 2,286,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #862,224 of 2,286,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature