Sophia 46 (1):21-34 (2007)
One cannot prove the truth of theological statement, but perhaps one can justify believing them because of the good consequences of doing so. It is irrational to believe statements of which there are good reasons to think false, but those of which there is some, albeit inconclusive, evidence can be believed for pragmatic reasons. However, in the interest of simplicity, it must not be possible to achieve those good consequences without such faith. John Bishop and others have argued that one need only assume theological statements to be true to enjoy the good consequences of a religious life, but in fact, faith is needed for most of these consequences to be achieved.
|Keywords||Religious belief Epistemic justification Pragmatic justification Pascal William James Wishful thinking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Religious Pluralism and Democratic Society: Political Liberalism and the Reasonableness of Religious Beliefs.Thomas Schmidt - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):43-56.
Rationalizing Beliefs: Evidential Vs. Pragmatic Reasons.Hamid Vahid - 2010 - Synthese 176 (3):447-462.
On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity.Andrew Koehl - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #137,334 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?