Logos I Ethos 50:47-65 (2019)

Authors
Anthony McCarthy
International Theological Institute
Abstract
In the 1960s, before the promulgation of Humanae Vitae, the Catholic philosophers Elizabeth Anscombe and Herbert McCabe OP debated whether there are convincing natural law arguments for the claim that contraception violates an exceptionless moral norm. This article revisits those arguments and critiques McCabe’s approach to natural law, concerned primarily with ‘social sin’ and not simply violations of ‘right reason,’ as one particularly ill-suited to addressing questions in sexual ethics and unable both to distinguish properly between certain forms of sexual wrongdoing and more obviously social sins such as theft, and also to distinguish between ‘natural’ and ‘unnatural’ sexual acts. Anscombe’s views, I argue, are closer to those of Thomas Aquinas and provide reasons for making the distinctions McCabe does not. An argument concerning the nature of the institution of marriage and the effects of non-marital acts on that institution is proposed as a way of strengthening Anscombe’s argument that contraception violates an exceptionless moral norm.
Keywords Moral Philosophy  Sexual Ethics  Contraception  Elizabeth Anscombe  Herbert McCabe  Thomas Aquinas  Aurel Kolnai
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Modern Moral Philosophy.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Anscombe and Geach on Mind and Soul.John Haldane - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):369-394.
On Anscombe’s Philosophical Method.Ulf Hlobil & Katharina Nieswandt - 2016 - Klēsis Revue Philosophique 35:180-198.
Elizabeth Anscombe and the New Natural Lawyers on Intentional Action.Matthew B. O’Brien - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):47-56.
Modern Moral Philosophy.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Elizabeth Anscombe and the New Natural Lawyers on Intentional Action.Matthew B. O'Brien - 2013 - National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly (1):47-56.
Anscombe and Wittgenstein.Elisa Grimi - 2020 - Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason 64:165-179.
Absolutes and Particulars.Tim Chappell - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:95-117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-24

Total views
383 ( #23,313 of 2,454,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
156 ( #3,477 of 2,454,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes