Apeiron 40 (4):345-374 (2007)

John P. McCaskey
Fordham University
Since at least late antiquity, Aristotle’s Prior Analytics B 23 has been misread. Aristotle does not think that an induction is a syllogism made good by complete enumeration. The confusion can be eliminated by considering the nature of the surviving text and watching very closely Aristotle’s moving back and forth between “induction” and “syllogism from induction.” Though he does move freely between them, the two are not synonyms.
Keywords induction  Prior Analytics B23  Aristotle
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/APEIRON.2007.40.4.345
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

More on Aristotelian Epagoge.T. Engberg-Pedersen - 1979 - Phronesis 24 (3):301-319.
A Note on A Ristotelian Epagōgē.Thomas V. Upton - 1981 - Phronesis 26 (2):172-176.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Indução e Ciência em Aristóteles.Tomás Roberto Troster - 2015 - Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Le Kitāb Al-Ta Līl d'Alfarabi.Dominique Mallet - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (2):317.
Impossibility in the Prior Analytics and Plato's Dialectic.B. Castelnérac - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (4):303-320.
Aristotelian Epagoge.D. W. Hamlyn - 1976 - Phronesis 21 (2):167-184.
Die Epagoge Bei Aristoteles.Kurt von Fritz - 1964 - Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.


Added to PP index

Total views
244 ( #46,146 of 2,519,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,529 of 2,519,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes