Finely crafted distinctions and the art of clinical ethics

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):5 – 11 (2001)

Authors
Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine
Abstract
Making finely crafted distinctions and deploying them in intellectually rigorous and clinically applicable judgments define, to a considerable degree, the art of clinical ethics. The papers in this Clinical Ethics number of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy demonstrate the art of clinical ethics in their consideration of respect for autonomy vs. respect for persons, the role of risk in triggering assessment of decisional capacity vs. the role of risk in the concept and assessment of decisional capacity, intention vs. foresight in the clinical management of ectopic pregnancy, preserving life vs. relieving suffering in physician-assisted suicide, and what is essential vs. non-essential in defining the core areas of ethics education for members of hospital ethics committees.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/jmep.26.1.5.3030
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,553
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
15 ( #531,088 of 2,248,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #311,048 of 2,248,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature