How to use a concept you reject

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):293-319 (2011)
Authors
Mark McCullagh
University of Guelph
Abstract
Inferentialist accounts of concept possession are often supported by examples in which rejection of some inference seems to amount to rejection of some concept, with the apparently implausible consequence that anyone who rejects the inference cannot so much as understand those who use the concept. This consequence can be avoided by distinguishing conditions necessary for direct uses of a concept (to describe the non-cognitive world) from conditions necessary for content-specifying uses (to specify what someone thinks or says). I consider how this claim about the non-uniformity of concept possession accords with different theories of attitude ascription and with claims about reverse compositionality. Surprisingly little stands in the way of the claim that someone unable to use a concept directly can nevertheless satisfy conditions for using it in a content-specifying thought
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.674.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,982
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Responsibility for Concepts.Rachel Fredericks - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Non-Circularity Constraint: Peacocke Vs. Peacocke. L. - 2003 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-2):85-93.
Deleuze's Concept of the Virtual and the Critique of the Possible.Daniel W. Smith - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (9):34-43.
On Value and Culture.Guiren Yuan - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):237-244.
What is Tarski's Common Concept of Consequence?Ignacio Jané - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.
Two Types of Circularity.I. L. Humberstone - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):249-280.
A Puzzle About Concept Possession.Mark Siebel - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-15

Total downloads
67 ( #94,378 of 2,274,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,919 of 2,274,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature