Cognitive Science 38 (6):1139-1189 (2014)

Abstract
In a seminal 1977 article, Rumelhart argued that perception required the simultaneous use of multiple sources of information, allowing perceivers to optimally interpret sensory information at many levels of representation in real time as information arrives. Building on Rumelhart's arguments, we present the Interactive Activation hypothesis—the idea that the mechanism used in perception and comprehension to achieve these feats exploits an interactive activation process implemented through the bidirectional propagation of activation among simple processing units. We then examine the interactive activation model of letter and word perception and the TRACE model of speech perception, as early attempts to explore this hypothesis, and review the experimental evidence relevant to their assumptions and predictions. We consider how well these models address the computational challenge posed by the problem of perception, and we consider how consistent they are with evidence from behavioral experiments. We examine empirical and theoretical controversies surrounding the idea of interactive processing, including a controversy that swirls around the relationship between interactive computation and optimal Bayesian inference. Some of the implementation details of early versions of interactive activation models caused deviation from optimality and from aspects of human performance data. More recent versions of these models, however, overcome these deficiencies. Among these is a model called the multinomial interactive activation model, which explicitly links interactive activation and Bayesian computations. We also review evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies supporting the view that interactive processing is a characteristic of the perceptual processing machinery in the brain. In sum, we argue that a computational analysis, as well as behavioral and neuroscience evidence, all support the Interactive Activation hypothesis. The evidence suggests that contemporary versions of models based on the idea of interactive activation continue to provide a basis for efforts to achieve a fuller understanding of the process of perception
Keywords Connectionist models  Perception  Interactive activation  Parallel distributed processing  Optimal perceptual inference  Neural networks
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12146
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
How Does a Brain Build a Cognitive Code?Stephen Grossberg - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (1):1-51.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Defense of a Non-Computational, Interactive Model of Visual Observation.Bonnie Tamarkin Paller - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:135 - 142.
Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-08-07

Total views
36 ( #317,983 of 2,518,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes