Philosophy of Science 86 (2):286-303 (2019)

Authors
Randall G. McCutcheon
University of Memphis
Abstract
Shuford, Albert and Massengill proved, a half century ago, that the logarithmic scoring rule is the only proper measure of inaccuracy determined by a differentiable function of probability assigned the actual cell of a scored partition. In spite of this, the log rule has gained less traction in applied disciplines and among formal epistemologists that one might expect. In this paper we show that the differentiability criterion in the Shuford et. al. result is unnecessary and use the resulting simplified characterization of the logarithmic rule to give novel arguments in favor of it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1086/702028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Scoring, Truthlikeness, and Value.Igor Douven - forthcoming - Synthese:1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Pragmatist’s Guide to Epistemic Utility.Benjamin Anders Levinstein - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (4):613-638.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-30

Total views
100 ( #109,110 of 2,454,824 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #117,399 of 2,454,824 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes