Induction in the Socratic Tradition

In Paolo C. Biondi & Louis F. Groarke (eds.), Shifting the Paradigm: Alternative Perspectives on Induction. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 161-192 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle said that induction (epagōgē) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here. Induction in the Scholastic and the (so-called) Humean tradition has presumed that Aristotle meant going from particular statements to universal statements. But the alternate view, namely that Aristotle meant going from particular things to universal ideas, prevailed all through antiquity and then again from the time of Francis Bacon until the mid-nineteenth century. Recent scholarship is so steeped in the first-mentioned tradition that we have virtually forgotten the other. In this essay McCaskey seeks to recover that alternate tradition, a tradition whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and in fact Aristotle himself. The examination is both historical and philosophical. The first part of the essay fills out the history. The latter part examines the most mature of the philosophies in the Socratic tradition, specifically Bacon’s and Whewell’s. After tracing out this tradition, McCaskey shows how this alternate view of induction is indeed employed in science, as exemplified by several instances taken from actual scientific practice. In this manner, McCaskey proposes to us that the Humean problem of induction is merely an artifact of a bad conception of induction and that a return to the Socratic conception might be warranted.

Similar books and articles

Socratic Epagōgē and Socratic Induction.Mark L. McPherran - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):347-364.
No Need to Justify Induction Generally.Kazuyoshi Kamiyama - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:105-111.
Overcoming the Problem of Induction: Science and Religion as Ways of Knowing.Alan Padgett - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 862--883.
Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View.Paul Muench - 2007 - Kierkegaardiana 24:132-162.
Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View.Paul Muench - 2006; rev. 2009 - In Sara Ahbel-Rappe & Rachana Kamtekar (eds.), Kierkegaardiana. Blackwell.
Essays on the philosophy of Socrates.Hugh H. Benson (ed.) - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Induction and Natural Kinds: Peirce, Quine, and Haack.Hsi-Heng Cheng - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (8):67-90.
Induction and objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-28

Downloads
678 (#25,742)

6 months
114 (#38,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John P. McCaskey
Fordham University

Citations of this work

William Whewell.Laura J. Snyder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Induction, Philosophical Conceptions of.John P. McCaskey - 2020 - Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references