Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):572-572 (1997)
AbstractAlthough the idea that cognitive structure changes as we learn is welcome, a variety of mathematical structures are needed to model the neural and cognitive processes involved. A specific example of bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence is given, building on a formalism given elsewhere. As the structure of cognition changes, previous learning can become tacit, adding to the complexity of cognition and its modeling.
Similar books and articles
Cognitive Functions, Bodily Sensibility and the Brain.Jay Schulkin - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):341-349.
The Feeling Body: Towards an Enactive Approach to Emotion.Giovanna Colombetti & Evan Thompson - 2008 - In W. F. Overton, U. Müller & J. L. Newman (eds.), Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness. Erlbaum.
A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science.Alvin I. Goldman - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):71-88.
Ghost Gestures: Phenomenological Investigations of Bodily Micromovements and Their Intercorporeal Implications. [REVIEW]Elizabeth A. Behnke - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (2):181-201.
Building Brains for Bodies.Rodney A. Brooks & Lynn Andrea Stein - 1994 - Autonomous Robotics 1 (1):7-25.
Cognitive Sciences: Basic Problems, New Perspectives and Implications for Artificial Intelligence.Maria Nowakowska - 1986 - Academic Press.
William James on Emotion and Intentionality.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):179-202.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads