Moral rights and animals

Abstract

In Section I, the purely conceptual issue as to whether animals other than human beings, all or some, may possess rights is examined. This is approached via a consideration of the concept of a moral right, and by way of examining the claims of sentience, consciousness, capacities for pleasure and pain, having desires, possessing interests, self-consciousness, rationality in various senses. It is argued that only beings possessed actually or potentially of the capacity to be morally self-determining can be possessors of rights. In Section II, normative questions concerning the rights animals might possess if they were to be capable of possessing rights are discussed. The approach followed is that of considering the kinds of argument advanced in support of human rights, and whether these arguments, and the rights they are claimed to establish, are transferable to animals, and whether there are or might be specifically animal rights. In Section III the question of what is or could be the goal of one who recognizes and seeks to respect all rights, animal and human, is raised. In particular, the issue as to whether a goal of maximizing the satisfaction of rights could remain a coherent one if animal rights are acknowledged, is explored.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-05

Downloads
201 (#59,778)

6 months
2 (#258,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Rights and Persons.Abraham Irving Melden - 1977 - University of California Press.
Did Socrates Commit Suicide?R. G. Frey - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (203):106 - 108.
McCloskey on Why Animals Cannot Have Rights.Tom Regan - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):251-257.
System of Ethics.Leonard Nelson & Norbert Guterman - 1956 - Yale University Press.
Interests and Animal Rights.R. G. Frey - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (108):254-259.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals.Stephen Puryear - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):250-269.
Moral Considerability and the Argument From Relevance.Oscar Horta - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (3):369-388.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.
Animal Ethics and Interest Conflicts.Elisa Aaltola - 2005 - Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):19-48.
Species as a Relationship.Julia Tanner - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (4):337-347.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Rights of Humans and Other Animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
The Right Not to Be Eaten.Thomas Auxter - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):221 – 230.
Animal Rights and Human Needs.Angus Taylor - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.