On a No Defeat Evidence Principle of Tal and Comesaña

Episteme 16 (3):237-240 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We offer a critical evaluation of a recent proposal of E. Tal and J. Comesa\~na on the topic of when evidence of evidence constitutes evidence. After establishing that attempts of L. Moretti and W. Roche to discredit the proposal miss their mark, we fashion another, which does not.

Similar books and articles

Tal and Comesaña on evidence of evidence.Luca Moretti - 2016 - The Reasoner 10 (5):38-39.
Evidence of evidence is evidence.Juan Comesaña & Eyal Tal - 2015 - Analysis 75 (4):557-559.
Higher-Order Defeat is Object-Independent.Joshua DiPaolo - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (2):248-269.
Misleading Evidence and the Dogmatism Puzzle.Ru Ye - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):563-575.
What is Evidence of Evidence Evidence of?Fabio Lampert & John Biro - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (2):195-206.
Comments on Carl Ginet’s “Self-Evidence”.Juan Comesaña - 2009 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 54 (2):41-47.
Higher‐Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.Maria Lasonen-Aarnio - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):314-345.
Conceivability, Explanation, and Defeat.Gordon Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (3):327 - 338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-13

Downloads
304 (#64,240)

6 months
66 (#66,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall G. McCutcheon
University of Memphis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations