Researcher Views About Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Nanotechnology
Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):699-717 (2012)
Abstract
Dependence in nanotechnology on external funding and academic-industry relationships has led to questions concerning its influence on research directions, as well as the potential for conflicts of interest to arise and impact scientific integrity and public trust. This study uses a survey of 193 nanotechnology industry and academic researchers to explore whether they share similar concerns. Although these concerns are not unique to nanotechnology, its emerging nature and the prominence of industry funding lend credence to understanding its researchers’ views, as these researchers are shaping the norms and direction of the field. The results of the survey show general agreement that funding sources are influencing research directions in nanotechnology; many respondents saw this influence in their own work as well as other researchers’ work. Respondents also agreed that funding considerations were likely to influence whether researchers shared their results. Irrespective of their institutional affiliation or funding status, twice as many researchers as not considered financial conflicts of interest a cause for concern, and three times as many respondents as not disagreed financial conflicts of interest in nanotechnology were uncommon. Only a third was satisfied with the way that conflicts of interest are currently managed and believed current procedures would protect the integrity of nanotechnology research. The results also found differences in views depending on researchers’ institutional affiliation and funding status.DOI
10.1007/s11948-011-9264-4
My notes
Similar books and articles
Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of academic research: A case study with commentaries.Brian Schrag, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil, Tristan J. Fiedler, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil & Tristan J. Fiedler - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):569-582.
Ethics and nanotechnology: Views of nanotechnology researchers. [REVIEW]Robert McGinn - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (2):101-131.
The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.
Taking conflicts of interest seriously without overdoing it: Promises and perils of academic-industry partnerships. [REVIEW]Jason Borenstein & Yvette E. Pearson - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):229-243.
Charitable conflicts of interest.Chris MacDonald, Michael McDonald & Wayne Norman - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):67 - 74.
Intrinsic Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: A Need for Disclosure.Sharmon Sollitto, Sharona Hoffman, Maxwell J. Mehlman, Robert J. Lederman, Stuart J. Youngner & Michael M. Lederman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):83-91.
The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.Paul J. Friedman - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
Commercialism and Universities: An Ethical Analysis. [REVIEW]Richard Carter - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (1):1-19.
Perception of risk and nanotechnology.E. Schuller - 2004 - In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios.
Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review.Bonnie E. Glaser & Lisa A. Bero - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):553-573.
Conflict of interest: The importance of potential.Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Proposed strategies for teaching ethics of nanotechnology.Heidi Jiao - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):221-228.
Reading nano: The public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in purchase patterns of books.Joachim Schummer - manuscript
Disclosures of funding sources and conflicts of interest in published HIV/AIDS research conducted in developing countries.R. Klitzman, L. J. Chin, H. Rifai-Bishjawish, K. Kleinert & C. -S. Leu - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):505-510.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-02-21
Downloads
23 (#501,879)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2011-02-21
Downloads
23 (#501,879)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Values in University–Industry Collaborations: The Case of Academics Working at Universities of Technology.Rafaela Hillerbrand & Claudia Werker - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (6):1633-1656.
Values in University–Industry Collaborations: The Case of Academics Working at Universities of Technology.Rafaela Hillerbrand & Claudia Werker - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (6):1633-1656.
Exploring Societal and Ethical Views of Nanotechnology REUs.Gina M. Eosco, Meghnaa Tallapragada, Katherine A. McComas & Merrill Brady - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (1):91-99.
Defining Nano, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Why Should It Matter?Priya Satalkar, Bernice Simone Elger & David M. Shaw - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1255-1276.
Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.Meghnaa Tallapragada, Gina M. Eosco & Katherine A. McComas - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):147-164.
References found in this work
Conflict of Interest in the Professions.Michael Davis & Andrew Stark (eds.) - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures.Sheldon Krimsky & L. S. Rothenberg - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):205-218.
Relationship between Funding Source and Conclusion among Nutrition-Related Scientific Articles.Lenard Lesser, Cara Ebbeling, Merrill Goozner, David Wypij & David Ludwig - 2007 - Plos Medicine 4 (1):e5.
The continuing need for disinterested research.John Ziman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):397-399.
Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians.G. K. Silverman, G. F. Loewenstein, B. L. Anderson, P. A. Ubel, S. Zinberg & J. Schulkin - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):265-270.