Philosophical Studies 159 (3):357-382 (2012)

Authors
Kevin McCain
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Abstract
It is commonplace to distinguish between propositional justification (having good reasons for believing p) and doxastic justification (believing p on the basis of those good reasons).One necessary requirement for bridging the gap between S’s merely having propositional justification that p and S’s having doxastic justification that p is that S base her belief that p on her reasons (propositional justification).A plausible suggestion for what it takes for S’s belief to be based on her reasons is that her reasons must contribute causally to S’s having that belief. Though this suggestion is plausible, causal accounts of the basing relation that have been proposed have not fared well. In particular, cases involving causal deviancy and cases involving over-determination have posed serious problems for causal accounts of the basing relation. Although previous causal accounts of the basing relation seem to fall before these problems, it is possible to construct an acceptable causal account of the basing relation. That is, it is possible to construct a causal account of the basing relation that not only fits our intuitions about doxastic justification in general, but also is not susceptible to the problems posed by causal deviancy and causal over-determination. The interventionist account of causation provides the tools for constructing such an account. My aim is to make use of the insights of the interventionist account of causation to develop and defend an adequate causal account of the basing relation.
Keywords Justification  Basing relation  Causation  Interventionist  Causal deviancy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-011-9712-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,744
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Basing Relation.Ram Neta - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (2):179-217.
The Epistemic Status of the Imagination.Joshua Myers - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-20.
The Problem of the Basing Relation.Ian Evans - 2013 - Synthese 190 (14):2943-2957.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Keith Lehrer on the Basing Relation.Hannah Tierney & Nicholas D. Smith - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):27-36.
On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.John Turri - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Can Indirect Causation Be Real?M. Gregory Oakes - 2007 - Metaphysica 8 (2):111-122.
How To Be Conservative: A Partial Defense of Epistemic Conservatism.Paul Silva - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):501-514.
Absences and Late Preemption.Oisín Deery - 2013 - Theoria 79 (1):309-325.
On the Causal-Doxastic Theory of the Basing Relation.Daniel M. Mittag - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):543 - 559.
The Causal-Doxastic Theory of the Basing Relation.Keith Allen Korcz - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (4):525-550.
Dis-Unified Pluralist Accounts of Causation.Jason Taylor - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):388-401.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-02-21

Total views
221 ( #42,204 of 2,425,263 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #151,007 of 2,425,263 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes