Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59 (1984)

Abstract
This paper has two purposes. One is primarily (but not exclusively) conceptual and the other is normative. The first aim is to say what inalienable rights are. To explain this, inalienable rights are contrasted with the notions of forfeitable rights and absolute rights. A recent novel analysis of inalienable rights by Feinberg is explained and criticized. The first task is concluded by discussing what duties inalienable rights imply. The second aim is to see what moral principles, if any, justify designating some rights as inalienable. The claim of Nozick and others that inalienable rights must be paternalistically grounded is examined and rejected. After a brief critical discussion of the Lockean and Hobbesean accounts of the basis of inalienable rights, it is argued that the harm principle can serve as an adequate ground for categorizing at least the right to life (and perhaps other rights) as inalienable.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00211224
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Contract Remedies and Inalienable Rights*: RANDY E. BARNETT.Randy E. Barnett - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):179-202.
Privacy, Interests, and Inalienable Rights.Adam D. Moore - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (2):327-355.
A Civil Liberties Analysis of Surrogacy Arrangements.Larry Gostin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):7-17.
A Civil Liberties Analysis of Surrogacy Arrangements.Larry Gostin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):7-17.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Inalienable Rights: Recent Criticism and Old Doctrine.B. A. Richards - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (3):391-404.
Terrance McConnell, Inalienable Rights.Alan Wertheimer - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (5):541-551.
Are There Any Inalienable Rights?Marvin Schiller - 1969 - Ethics 79 (4):309-315.
Inalienable Rights.Frank J. Leavitt - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (259):115 - 118.
Are There Inalienable Rights?John O. Nelson - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (250):519 - 524.
Natural Rights to Welfare.Siegfried Van Duffel - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
Inalienable Rights.Stuart M. Brown - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):192-211.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
121 ( #91,248 of 2,461,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes