David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):44-59 (2002)
Hegel's rejection of the Kantian thing-in-itself makes the "an sich" an ingredient in experience—that about a thing which is not yet present to us is what it is "an sich." Hegel bars thus any philosophical appeal to anything construed as atemporal, a path which I argue was also taken by Nietzsche, Foucault, Rorty, and Habermas. Unlike them, however, Hegel pursues a project of systematic philosophy, which now consists in showing how temporal things mutually support one another. The recent Continental philosophers I discuss do not share this systematic conception; hence some of their most distinctive insights and problems.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Howard Ponzer (2008). Reconciliation in Hegel's Speculative Idealism. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):49-66.
Jon Stewart (2010). Idealism and Existentialism: Hegel and Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
Franz Gabriel Nauen (1972). Revolution, Idealism and Human Freedom: Schelling, Hölderlin and Hegel and the Crisis of Early German Idealism. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #120,818 of 1,924,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,998 of 1,924,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?