Bioethics 25 (2):66-74 (2011)
AbstractBioethics has a founding story in which medical paternalism, the interference with the autonomy of patients for their own clinical benefit, was an accepted ethical norm in the history of Western medical ethics and was widespread in clinical practice until bioethics changed the ethical norms and practice of medicine. In this paper I show that the founding story of bioethics misreads major texts in the history of Western medical ethics. I also show that a major source for empirical claims about the widespread practice of medical paternalism has been misread. I then show that that bioethics based on its founding story deprofessionalizes medical ethics. The result leaves the sick exposed to the predatory power of medical practitioners and healthcare organizations with only their autonomy-based rights to non-interference, expressed in contracts, to protect them. The sick are stripped of the protection afforded by a professional, fiduciary relationship of physicians to their patients. Bioethics based on its founding story reverts to the older model of a contractual relationship between the sick and medical practitioners not worthy of intellectual or moral trust (because such trust cannot be generated by what I call ‘deprofessionalizing bioethics’). On closer examination, bioethics based on its founding story, ironically, eliminates paternalism as a moral category in bioethics, thus causing bioethics to collapse on itself because it denies one of the necessary conditions for medical paternalism. Bioethics based on its founding story should be abandoned
Similar books and articles
Autonomy & Paternalism: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Health Care.Thomas Nys, Yvonne Denier & Toon Vandevelde (eds.) - 2007 - Peeters.
Respect for Autonomy and Medical Paternalism Reconsidered.L. B. McCullough & Alan W. Cross - 1985 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (3).
Philosophical Challenges in Teaching Bioethics: The Importance of Professional Medical Ethics and its History for Bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):395 – 402.
Methodological Concerns in Bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Bioethics and the Humanities: Attitudes and Perceptions.R. S. Downie - 2007 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.
Accounting for Context: Future Directions in Bioethics Theory and Research.Darleen Douglas-Steele & Edward M. Hundert - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (2).
Understanding the Trusted Doctor and Constructing a Theory of Bioethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):493-504.
Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century.Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Principled and Cosmopolitan Neuroethics: Considerations for International Relevance.John R. Shook & James Giordano - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9:1.
Health-Care Professionals’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Relating to Patient Capacity to Consent to Treatment.Scott Lamont, Yun-Hee Jeon & Mary Chiarella - 2013 - Nursing Ethics 20 (6):684-707.
Considering Virtue: Public Health and Clinical Ethics.Karen M. Meagher - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):888-893.
Medicine as a Profession: A Hypothetical Imperative in Clinical Ethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (1):1-7.
References found in this work
No references found.