Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275 (2003)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
In a recent paper titled ' Simples ', Ned Markosian asks and answers the Simple Question, which is, 'under what circumstances is it true of some object that it has no proper parts?' Markosian 's answer to the simple question is MaxCon, which states that an object is a simple if and only if it is a maximally continuous object. I present several arguments against MaxCon
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1093/ajp/jag208 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Why Can’T I Change Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony?David Friedell - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):805-824.
View all 26 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Conceiving Simple Experiences.Michael V. Antony - 2001 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):263-86.
Simples and the Possibility of Discrete Space.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):117 – 128.
A Compatibilist Version of the Theory of Agent Causation.Ned Markosian - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):257-277.
More Problems for MaxCon: Contingent Particularity and Stuff-Thing Coincidence.Mark Steen - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (2):135-154.
Soc It to Me? Reply to McDaniel on Maxcon Simples.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):332 – 340.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
119 ( #98,302 of 2,506,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,844 )
2009-01-28
Total views
119 ( #98,302 of 2,506,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
