Southwestern Philosophy Review 17 (1):35-44 (2000)

Authors
Jeffrey McDonough
Harvard University
Abstract
In his Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Paul Guyer offers an influential reading of Kant’s famous “Refutation of Idealism.” Guyer’s reading has been widely praised as Kantian exegesis but less favorably received as an anti-skeptical line of argument worthy of contemporary interest. In this paper, I focus on defending the general thrust of Guyer’s reading as a response to Cartesian skepticism. The paper falls into two sections. The first section constructs Guyer’s central argument in three steps and gives it a quasi-formal presentation. That presentation reveals the principal obstacle to the argument’s being convincing to a contemporary audience, namely, its apparent reliance on Kant’s prohibition against psychological laws governing mental states. The second section constructs a lemma in defense of Guyer’s general line of attack. In effect, it suggests that that line does not depend on a metaphysical ban on psychological laws, but only on the modest premise that according to the Cartesian’s concept of knowledge such laws cannot justify claims about the temporal order of the self.
Keywords kant  idealism  guyer  refutation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview20001715
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism.Paul Guyer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):329-383.
Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate.Dennis Schulting - 2010 - In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Beauty, Systematicity, and the Highest Good: Eckart Förster's Kant's Final Synthesis.Paul Guyer - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):195 – 214.
The Role of Kant’s Refutation of Idealism.Ralf M. Bader - 2012 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
Comments on Guyer.R. Sebastian - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):489 – 496.
Kant's Refutation of Idealism: A Reply to Chignell.Georges Dicker - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):175-183.
Kant's Transcendental Idealism and the Limits of Knowledge : Kant's Alternative to Locke's Physiology.Paul Guyer - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 79-99.
Kant's First Analogy and the Refutation of Idealism.Mark Sacks - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):113–130.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-22

Total views
135 ( #64,955 of 2,326,400 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #431,580 of 2,326,400 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes