Experimental mathematics, computers and the a priori

Synthese 190 (3):397-412 (2013)
Abstract
In recent decades, experimental mathematics has emerged as a new branch of mathematics. This new branch is defined less by its subject matter, and more by its use of computer assisted reasoning. Experimental mathematics uses a variety of computer assisted approaches to verify or prove mathematical hypotheses. For example, there is “number crunching” such as searching for very large Mersenne primes, and showing that the Goldbach conjecture holds for all even numbers less than 2 × 1018. There are “verifications” of hypotheses which, while not definitive proofs, provide strong support for those hypotheses, and there are proofs involving an enormous amount of computer hours, which cannot be surveyed by any one mathematician in a lifetime. There have been several attempts to argue that one or another aspect of experimental mathematics shows that mathematics now accepts empirical or inductive methods, and hence shows mathematical apriorism to be false. Assessing this argument is complicated by the fact that there is no agreed definition of what precisely experimental mathematics is. However, I argue that on any plausible account of ’experiment’ these arguments do not succeed.
Keywords Experimental mathematics  Mathematical apriorism  Computer assisted proofs  Non-deductive methodology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-0035-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,769
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Mathematics as a Science of Patterns.D. Resnik Michael - 1997 - New York ;Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge.Philip Kitcher - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
What is Mathematical Truth?Hilary Putnam - 1975 - In Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60--78.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Epistemological Status of Computer-Assisted Proofs.Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):374-387.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Apriority and Applied Mathematics.Robert A. Holland - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):349 - 370.
Proofs and Arguments: The Special Case of Mathematics.Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):157-169.
Medium AI and Experimental Science.André Kukla - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):493-5012.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-20

Total downloads

59 ( #87,709 of 2,158,859 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #193,365 of 2,158,859 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums