The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation [Book Review]

Argumentation 13 (1):43-52 (1999)
Abstract
Legal theory and practice, particularly on the exchange of pleadings, are referred to as a means of examining current thinking in pragmatics on relevance. The rules of pleadings suggest that the concept of relevance as used in pragmatics is emptied of any meaning and that theories of argumentation have not sufficiently taken into account the preliminary construction which issues to be argued about require.
Keywords Pleading  pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation  relevance
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1007742425789
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Pragmatics.Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Pleadings Game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.
Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.
EI Ámbito de la Pragmática.Eduardo Bustos - 1985 - Theoria 1 (2):461-479.
Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total downloads
14 ( #374,943 of 2,225,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #140,569 of 2,225,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature