The epistemological status of computer-assisted proofs

Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):374-387 (2008)
Authors
Mark McEvoy
Hofstra University
Abstract
Several high-profile mathematical problems have been solved in recent decades by computer-assisted proofs. Some philosophers have argued that such proofs are a posteriori on the grounds that some such proofs are unsurveyable; that our warrant for accepting these proofs involves empirical claims about the reliability of computers; that there might be errors in the computer or program executing the proof; and that appeal to computer introduces into a proof an experimental element. I argue that none of these arguments withstands scrutiny, and so there is no reason to believe that computer-assisted proofs are not a priori. Thanks are due to Michael Levin, David Corfield, and an anonymous referee for Philosophia Mathematica for their helpful comments. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Hofstra University Department of Mathematics colloquium series, and at the 2005 New Jersey Regional Philosophical Association; I am grateful to both audiences for their comments. CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    What's this?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007, 2008
DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkn014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,035
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Content Preservation.Tyler Burge - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):457-488.
Content Preservation.Tyler Burge - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):457.
Kitcher, Mathematical Intuition, and Experience.Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):227-237.
On Tymoczko's Argument for Mathematical Empiricism.Margarita R. Levin - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (1):79 - 86.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Are There Psychological Species?Joshua Fost - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2):293-315.
E-Science and the Data Deluge.David Casacuberta & Jordi Vallverdú - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Diagrams in Mathematical Arguments.David Sherry - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):59-74.
Linear Logic in Computer Science.Thomas Ehrhard (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Probabilistic Proofs and Transferability.Kenny Easwaran - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):341-362.
Electronic Media Review.M. B. Burke - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (3):255-260.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #108,355 of 2,312,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #243,631 of 2,312,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature