The rights and wrongs of consequentialism
Philosophical Studies 151 (3):393 - 412 (2010)
Abstract
I argue that the strongest form of consequentialism is one which rejects the claim that we are morally obliged to bring about the best available consequences, but which continues to assert that what there is most reason to do is bring about the best available consequences. Such an approach promises to avoid common objections to consequentialism, such as demandingness objections. Nevertheless, the onus is on the defender of this approach either to offer her own account of what moral obligations we do face, or to explain why offering such a theory is ill-advised. I consider, and reject, one attempt at the second sort of strategy, put forward by Alastair Norcross, who defends a 'scalar' consequentialism which eschews the moral concepts of right, wrong and obligation, and limits itself to claims about what is better and worse. I go on to raise some considerations which suggest that no systematic consequentialist theory of our moral obligations will be plausible, and propose instead that consequentialism should have a more informal and indirect role in shaping what we take our moral obligations to beAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1007/s11098-009-9458-7
My notes
Similar books and articles
7 Consequentialism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 143.
Indirect consequentialism, suboptimality, and friendship.Matthew Tedesco - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):567–577.
Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism.Douglas W. Portmore - 2011 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Truth and acceptance conditions for moral statements can be identical: Further support for subjective consequentialism.Scott Forschler - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (3):337-346.
Can consequentialism be reconciled with our common-sense moral intuitions?Douglas W. Portmore - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 91 (1):1-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-10-17
Downloads
312 (#38,170)
6 months
5 (#153,645)
2009-10-17
Downloads
312 (#38,170)
6 months
5 (#153,645)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Degrees of Assertability.Sam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1):19-49.
Scalar consequentialism the right way.Neil Sinhababu - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (12):3131-3144.
References found in this work
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment.Allan Gibbard - 1990 - Harvard University Press.