Estetika 47 (1):3-26 (2010)

Abstract
The paper considers an argument of Richard Wollheim’s, originally presented in a 1976 symposium with Goodman and Wiggins, which disappeared when the symposium contribution was ‘reprinted’ in the supplementary essays to the expanded edition of Art and Its Objects (Wollheim, 1980). It lays out the argument’s original context, locating its objectives by means of a comparison with Goodman’s autographic/allographic distinction, with its attendant discussion of the ‘history of production’, and presents Wollheim’s defence of ‘the artist’s theory’. This defence coheres in interesting ways with Wollheim’s aesthetics emphasis on the importance of the artist’s intention (suitably understood) as part of a specification of what the work itself is. This conception reinforces the importance Wollheim grants both to the fulfilled intentions of the artist and to a suitably positioned, suitably informed, and suitably sensitive spectator. Both should be modelled as operating under the aegis of the artist’s theory, a notion this ‘missing’ argument serves to emphasize
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,536
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neurosis and the Artist.Richard Wollheim - 1975 - Leonardo 8 (2):155--157.
David Carrier's Art History.Jonathan Gilmore - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47.
Projective Properties and Expression in Literary Appreciation.Elisa Galgut - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):143-153.
What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?Richard Wollheim - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):131–147.
What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?Robert Hopkins - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):149–167.
Vocation of the Artist.Thomas Ewens - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):329-352.
Wollheim on Emotion and Imagination.Peter Goldie - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):1-17.
Wollheim and the Institutional Theory of Art.Graham McFee - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (139):179-185.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-02-21

Total views
20 ( #503,364 of 2,385,502 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,835 of 2,385,502 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes