Guilty Robots, Happy Dogs: The Question of Alien Minds

Oxford University Press (2008)
Abstract
When we interact with animals, we intuitively read thoughts and feelings into their expressions and actions - it is easy to suppose that they have minds like ours. And as technology grows more sophisticated, we might soon find ourselves interpreting the behaviour of robots too in human terms. It is natural for us to humanize other beings in this way, but is it philosophically or scientifically justifiable? How different might the minds of animals or machines be to ours? As David McFarland asks here, could robots ever feel guilty, and is it correct to suppose your dog can truly be happy? Can we ever know what non-human minds might be like, or will the answer be forever out of our reach? These are central and important questions in the philosophy of mind, and this book is an accessible exploration of the differing philosophical positions that can be taken on the issue. McFarland looks not only at philosophy, but also examines new evidence from the science of animal behaviour plus the latest developments in robotics and artificial intelligence, to show how many different - and sometimes surprising - conclusions we can draw about the nature of 'alien minds'.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
Buy the book $1.00 used (98% off)   $5.99 new (86% off)   $39.95 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780199219292   019921929X   9780199219308
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,651
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective.Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Robotrust and Legal Responsibility.Ugo Pagallo - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):367-379.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Of Robots and Believing.C. T. A. Schmidt - 2005 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):195-205.
Human Minds.David Papineau - 2001 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159-183.
Can a Machine Be Conscious? How?Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):67-75.
When a Person Feels That She Is Guilty and Believes That She Is Not Guilty.Juha Räikkä - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:149-152.
Computational Meta-Ethics.Gert-Jan Lokhorst - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (2):261-274.
Moral Appearances: Emotions, Robots, and Human Morality. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
Can We Trust Robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-01-31

Total downloads

14 ( #319,700 of 2,143,474 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #185,660 of 2,143,474 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums