Oxford University Press (2008)
When we interact with animals, we intuitively read thoughts and feelings into their expressions and actions - it is easy to suppose that they have minds like ours. And as technology grows more sophisticated, we might soon find ourselves interpreting the behaviour of robots too in human terms. It is natural for us to humanize other beings in this way, but is it philosophically or scientifically justifiable? How different might the minds of animals or machines be to ours? As David McFarland asks here, could robots ever feel guilty, and is it correct to suppose your dog can truly be happy? Can we ever know what non-human minds might be like, or will the answer be forever out of our reach? These are central and important questions in the philosophy of mind, and this book is an accessible exploration of the differing philosophical positions that can be taken on the issue. McFarland looks not only at philosophy, but also examines new evidence from the science of animal behaviour plus the latest developments in robotics and artificial intelligence, to show how many different - and sometimes surprising - conclusions we can draw about the nature of 'alien minds'.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$1.00 used (98% off) $5.99 new (86% off) $28.21 direct from Amazon (30% off) Amazon page|
|ISBN(s)||9780199219292 019921929X 9780199219308|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective.Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Robotrust and Legal Responsibility.Ugo Pagallo - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):367-379.
Brain–Computer Interfaces and Dualism: A Problem of Brain, Mind, and Body.Joseph Lee - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (1):29-40.
Killers, Fridges, and Slaves: A Legal Journey in Robotics. [REVIEW]Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (4):347-354.
Similar books and articles
David McFarland and Thomas Bösser, Intelligent Behavior in Animals and Robots.Sunil Cherian & Wade O. Troxell - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (3):452-456.
Ordinary Devices: Reply to Bringsjord's Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser. [REVIEW]Larry Hauser - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (1):115-117.
Building Simple Mechanical Minds: Using Lego Robots for Research and Teaching in Philosophy.John P. Sullins - 2002 - In James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.), Metaphilosophy. Blackwell. pp. 110-122.
Human Minds.David Papineau - 2001 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159-183.
Can a Machine Be Conscious? How?Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4):67-75.
Robots, Dennett and the Autonomous: A Terminological Investigation. [REVIEW]C. T. A. Schmidt & F. Kraemer - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (1):73-80.
When a Person Feels That She Is Guilty and Believes That She Is Not Guilty.Juha Räikkä - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:149-152.
In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care.Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
The Implications of an Externalist Theory of Rule-Following Behavior for Robot Cognition.Diane Proudfoot - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):283-308.
Moral Appearances: Emotions, Robots, and Human Morality. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
On Building Robot Persons: Response to Zlatev. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (3):381-385.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads15 ( #314,299 of 2,169,366 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,284 of 2,169,366 )
How can I increase my downloads?