A New/Old Ontology of Film

Film-Philosophy 17 (1):265-280 (2013)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the ontological effects of digital technology, and determine whether digital films, traditional films, and pre-traditional motion pictures belong to the same category. I begin by defining the parameters of my inquiry, and then consider the two most significant consequences of the new technology. §2 proposes a decisive refutation of the causal relationship between reality and photography. §3 identifies an end to the dominance of photorealistic film over animation, and argues for an inversion of that relationship, whereby animation is paramount. Finally, I consider the implications of these consequences for film ontology, compare theories, and conclude in favour of Berys Gaut, for whom digital film is the latest incarnation of a history of moving pictures that stretches back for centuries

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
113 (#106,455)

6 months
3 (#197,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafe McGregor
Edge Hill University

References found in this work

Photography and Representation.Roger Scruton - 1981 - Critical Inquiry 7 (3):577-603.
On the Nature of Photography.Rudolf Arnheim - 1972 - Critical Inquiry 1 (1):149-161.
The Illusion of Realism in Film.Andrew Kania - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):243-258.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cinematic.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (46):78-95.
Motion(Less) Pictures: The Cinema of Stasis.J. Remes - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):257-270.
Film Authorship and Collaboration.Berys Gaut - 1997 - In Richard Allen & Murray Smith (eds.), Film Theory and Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--172.
A Philosophy of Cinematic Art.Berys Gaut - 2010 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
New Takes in Film-Philosophy.Havi Carel & Greg Tuck (eds.) - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
On Cinema and Perversion.Berys Gaut - 1994 - Film & Philosophy (Society for the Philosophic Study of the Contemporary Visual Arts) 1:3-17.