Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):545 - 566 (2010)

Authors
Andrew McGonigal
Washington and Lee University
Abstract
Some artworks manifest moral attitudes. I clarify and defend an argument to the effect that these works can be aesthetically better merely because morally good people skilfully produced them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.619.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aesthetic Reasons.McGonigal Andrew - forthcoming - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Aesthetic Empiricism.Fabian Dorsch - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin & Jon Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-100.
Art and achievement.James Grant - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2517-2539.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
75 ( #139,184 of 2,439,094 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,094 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes