Brian Ellis, Scientific Essentialism [Book Review]

Philosophy in Review 22 (4):269-271 (2002)

Authors
Patrick McGivern
University of Wollongong
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Ellis and to Handfield on Essentialism, Laws, and Counterfactuals.Marc Lange - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):581 – 588.
Bigelow's Worries About Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 1999 - In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 61--75.
Marc Lange on Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):75 – 79.
Dispositional Essentialism.Brian Ellis & Caroline Lierse - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):27 – 45.
Essences, Kinds, and Laws of Nature.Stephen Mumford - 2002 - Metascience 11 (3):324-328.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-14

Total views
23 ( #472,829 of 2,448,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #302,300 of 2,448,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes