Logical commitment and semantic indeterminacy: A reply to Williamson

Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (1):123-136 (2004)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Linguistics   Philosophy of Language   Artificial Intelligence   Computational Linguistics   Semantics   Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1023/B:LING.0000010799.46646.dd
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
True, Truer, Truest.Brian Weatherson - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 123 (1-2):47-70.
Luminosity and Determinacy.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):765-786.
Indeterminate Truth.Patrick Greenough - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):213-241.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Intension and Representation: Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis Revisited.Itay Shani - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):415 – 440.
Semantic Plasticity and Epistemicism.Adam Sennet - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (2):273-285.
Review of Timothy Williamson's Vagueness. [REVIEW] McGee, Vann & Brian McLaughlin - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21:221-231.
Reply to McGee and McLaughlin.Timothy Williamson - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (1):113-122.
The Metaphysics of Words.Roy Sorensen - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):193 - 214.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
93 ( #57,821 of 2,202,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #61,822 of 2,202,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature