Ethical Perspectives 20 (3):403-426 (2013)

Authors
Rafe McGregor
Edge Hill University
Abstract
In this paper I propose a new argument for moderate autonomism. I call this the ‘critical argument’ to distinguish it from the empirical argument of James C. Anderson and Jeffrey T. Dean, and the no-error argument of James Harold. My strategy is to first employ the criticism of Matthew Arnold and F.R. Leavis to demonstrate the moralist failure to account for the complexity of the relationship between literature and morality, and then offer a more promising alternative. I set out the autonomist, moralist, and immoralist positions in the value interaction debate in §1, and identify problems with classifying the two critics in contemporary terms. In §2 I discuss Arnold’s cultural criticism as both a part of – and a reaction to – the public moralist tradition that dominated Britain in the nineteenth century, drawing attention to his criterion of ‘seriousness’. §3 examines Leavis’ literary criticism, focusing on his conception of the relationship between composition and life, and his criterion of ‘maturity’. Drawing on the similarities between Arnold and Leavis, I demonstrate that their concern with morality differs from that of the contemporary moralists in §4. In §5 I employ John Gibson’s distinction between normative and informative values to complete the argument for moderate autonomism. I test my argument against an extreme case, a hypothetical literary equivalent to The Birth of a Nation, in §6, and conclude that moderate autonomism provides the most compelling solution to the value interaction debate.
Keywords Aesthetic value  Ethical Value  Philosophy of Literature
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moderate Moralism Versus Moderate Autonomism.Noel Carroll - 1998 - British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):419-424.
Autonomism Reconsidered.James Harold - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):137-147.
Moderate Autonomism.James C. Anderson & Jeffrey T. Dean - 1998 - British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2):150-166.
Ethical Autonomism.Rob van Gerwen - 2004 - Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Between Relativism and Absolutism? – The Failure of Kuhn’s Moderate Relativism.Markus Seidel - 2013 - Was Dürfen Wir Glauben? Was Sollen Wir Tun? Sektionsbeiträge des Achten Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft Für Analytische Philosophie E.V.
Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine.Tony Stone & Martin Davies - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-15

Total views
54 ( #213,811 of 2,533,485 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,485 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes