More Fetters to unfetter: A reply to Depew and Schmaus

Social Epistemology 16 (4):399 – 409 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to two reviews of our book "Science Unfettered: A Philosophical Study of Sociohistorical Ontology." We clarify the relationship between the ontological and the ontic, the key phrases: 'being-in-the-world,' the 'facticity' of human existence. We show where the sources of reviewers misunderstandings lie.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,286

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#900,642)

6 months
5 (#989,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

John McGuire
University College Dublin
Barbara Tuchanska
University of Lodz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
Philosophical hermeneutics.Hans-Georg Gadamer (ed.) - 1976 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Philosophical arguments.Charles Taylor - 1995 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Science Unfettered: Philosophical Study in Sociohistorical Ontology.James E. Mcguire & Barbara Tuchanska - 2000 - Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. Edited by Barbara Tuchańska.

Add more references