Wittgenstein and Internal Relations

European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):495-509 (2010)
Abstract
Abstract: Interpretations of the Tractatus divide into what might be called a metaphysical and an anti-metaphysical approach to the work. The central issue between the two interpretative approaches has generally been characterised in terms of the question whether the Tractatus is committed to the idea of ‘things’ that cannot be said in language, and thus to the idea of a distinctive kind of nonsense: nonsense that is an attempt to say what can only be shown. In this paper, I look at this dispute from a different perspective, by focusing on the treatment of the concept of internal relations. By reference to the work of Peter Hacker, Hidé Ishiguro and Cora Diamond, I show how this concept is understood quite differently in each of the two interpretative traditions. I focus particularly on how Wittgenstein's idea of the ‘internal relation of depicting that holds between language and the world’ (Tractatus 4.014) might be understood within the two interpretative approaches. I offer some reasons in support of the anti-metaphysical treatment of the concept
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00359.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Metaphysics and Nonsense.Warren Goldfarb - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (1):57-73.
Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Thomas Ricketts - 1996 - In Hans D. Sluga & David G. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--99.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory and the Distinction Between Representing and Depicting.Jimmy Plourde - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1):16-39.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Wittgenstein, Contextualism, and Nonsense.Edmund Dain - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:101-125.
Wittgenstein on Expectation, Action, and Internal Relations, 1930-1932.Andreas Blank - 2007 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):270 – 287.
Ineffability and Nonsense.Peter Sullivan - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.
On the 'Resolute' Reading of the Tractatus.John Koethe - 2003 - Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):187–204.
Contextualism and Nonsense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Edmund Dain - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):91-101.
Ineffability and Nonsense.A. W. Moore - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.
The New Wittgenstein (Review). [REVIEW]Anton Alterman - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (3):456-457.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-06-04

Total downloads

133 ( #36,132 of 2,172,903 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #324,815 of 2,172,903 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums