European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):495-509 (2010)
Abstract: Interpretations of the Tractatus divide into what might be called a metaphysical and an anti-metaphysical approach to the work. The central issue between the two interpretative approaches has generally been characterised in terms of the question whether the Tractatus is committed to the idea of ‘things’ that cannot be said in language, and thus to the idea of a distinctive kind of nonsense: nonsense that is an attempt to say what can only be shown. In this paper, I look at this dispute from a different perspective, by focusing on the treatment of the concept of internal relations. By reference to the work of Peter Hacker, Hidé Ishiguro and Cora Diamond, I show how this concept is understood quite differently in each of the two interpretative traditions. I focus particularly on how Wittgenstein's idea of the ‘internal relation of depicting that holds between language and the world’ (Tractatus 4.014) might be understood within the two interpretative approaches. I offer some reasons in support of the anti-metaphysical treatment of the concept
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy.David Pears - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Thomas Ricketts - 1996 - In Hans D. Sluga & David G. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--99.
Citations of this work BETA
Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory and the Distinction Between Representing and Depicting.Jimmy Plourde - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1):16-39.
Similar books and articles
Wittgenstein, Contextualism, and Nonsense.Edmund Dain - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:101-125.
Wittgenstein on Expectation, Action, and Internal Relations, 1930-1932.Andreas Blank - 2007 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):270 – 287.
Elucidation, Meta-Philosophy, and Hacker's Use of “External Evidence”.Kevin M. Cahill - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:73-99.
Ineffability and Nonsense.Peter Sullivan - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.
On the 'Resolute' Reading of the Tractatus.John Koethe - 2003 - Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):187–204.
Contextualism and Nonsense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Edmund Dain - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):91-101.
Ineffability and Nonsense.A. W. Moore - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.
Logical Syntax in the Tractatus.Ian Proops - 2001 - In Richard Gaskin (ed.), Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 163.
The New Wittgenstein (Review). [REVIEW]Anton Alterman - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (3):456-457.
Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Logic and Language.Marie McGinn - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-06-04
Total downloads133 ( #36,132 of 2,172,903 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,815 of 2,172,903 )
How can I increase my downloads?